home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0157>
- <title>
- Aug. 09, 1993: Reviews:Cinema
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Aug. 09, 1993 Lost Secrets Of The Maya
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 57
- CINEMA
- Renewing an Old Duel
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By RICHARD SCHICKEL
- </p>
- <qt>
- <l>TITLE: The Fugitive</l>
- <l>DIRECTOR: Andrew Davis</l>
- <l>WRITERS: Jeb Stuart and David Twohy</l>
- </qt>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: Reimagined instead of recycled, an adaptation
- of a '60s old TV show emerges as a first-rate thriller.
- </p>
- <p> A smart federal law-enforcement officer, his wit informed by
- years of experience and buttressed by all the latest crime-fighting
- technology; a cunning, daring criminal managing always to stay
- just an infuriating half step ahead of his pursuer; a final
- confrontation that begins at a large, celebratory public occasion,
- proceeds to vertiginous grapplings along the edge of a big-city
- high-rise and ends with justice done by the narrowest, scariest
- of margins.
- </p>
- <p> Old news, you say. You've already seen and loved In the Line
- of Fire. Well, here comes another movie that deploys similar
- elements, including deeply satisfying star performances and
- high-energy directorial craftsmanship. The difference between
- them arises from a couple of simple role reversals. In The Fugitive
- the criminal is actually an innocent man: Richard Kimble (Harrison
- Ford), a surgeon falsely accused of murdering his wife. The
- lawman--a U.S. marshal named Sam Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones)--is the character in the grips of a dangerous obsession, namely
- to capture the eponymous escapee.
- </p>
- <p> The best measure of this movie's merits is that the cross-reference
- that springs most readily to mind is another well-made current
- movie. But everyone knows The Fugitive derives its title, protagonist
- and basic situation from the 1960s television series in which
- David Janssen, as the luckless Kimble, was pursued across many
- years and many states by Barry Morse's implacable detective.
- It was Les Miserables in prime time, and that overtone is lost
- in this adaptation, which compresses the pursuit and confines
- it mostly to Chicago. But the tension and realism that result
- from permitting Kimble less running room amply compensate for
- the diminishment of the original's romantic aura.
- </p>
- <p> Not all that was good about the old Kimble has been lost. He
- can still spare risky time to help others, like a child being
- ignored, at peril to his life, in an emergency room. He still
- has the recklessness that comes to people who have nothing left
- to lose (the most spectacular of his hair-breadth escapes is
- a dive into the torrent coursing over a dam hundreds of feet
- high). And he still has his own pursuit to pursue--of the
- one-armed man whom he alone knows is his wife's actual murderer.
- </p>
- <p> Busy fellow, and nobody plays harried better than Harrison Ford.
- He plays other things well too, notably in the scene in which,
- as he is interrogated by the police, he comes to realize that
- he is their chief suspect. Grief, outrage, incomprehension,
- terror--what a rich mixture of emotions he registers in a
- matter of seconds. Jones may have a somewhat simpler line to
- play in the movie, but he is a marvelously incisive actor, and
- he brings his character right up to the edge of the demonic
- without falling into the psychotic abyss. He is playing the
- role of a man playing a role--tough omnicompetence--and
- the little flickers of ironic self-awareness he permits himself
- as he judges his effect on others are delicious.
- </p>
- <p> Which brings us back to a final comparison with In the Line
- of Fire. Both these movies are tightly wound duels between vividly
- contrasting characters who match up only in the quality of their
- intelligence. Both more than satisfy the most primitive demand
- of the action genre, which is, of course, for plenty of action.
- But unlike most films of their kind these days, they do not
- feel machine-made. They take the time (and it doesn't require
- much) for the digressions that enlist real concern--not just
- in what's going to happen next, but in the fates of their characters
- as well.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-